Início » South-to-South Learning Spaces vs Disinformation Disinformation and Elections South-to-South Learning Spaces vs Disinformation Introduction to op-ed series funded by Luminate Jonathan Corpus Ong Rafael Grohmann Global South disinformation advocacies too often tend to replicate certain Euro-American frames of platform and technological determinism where Facebook, Russian operations, or Cambridge Analytica are blamed for influencing unthinking voters, similar to discourses about electoral hijacking in 2016 polls in the United States and the United Kingdom. We suggest global South scholars and activists to work more strategically to advance “Southern” frames that center their shared experiences of media censorship, nationalist attacks against “Western” human rights principles, and thriving local economies of disinformation-for-hire. Rather than anticipate Global North-to-Global South policy flows in the disinformation space, we recommend that researchers and civil society actors to build more South-to-South knowledge exchange spaces that bring us in direct conversation, connecting researchers and advocates in Philippines, Brazil, India, Thailand, and Nigeria, among others. For example, best practices in election monitoring could be exchanged between the Philippines and Brazil. DigiLabour is now launching an op-ed series on disinformation and elections in the Global South, at a time when Brazil faces one of its most important elections in recent decades. This op-ed series is part of the project “Global Democracy Frontliners: Transnational Research Coalition for Tech Accountability and Democratic Innovations Centering Communities in the Margins”, funded by Luminate. We see this series of interventions connecting and comparing Philippines and Brazil researchers and activists as an important experimental contribution to this initiative. If you are interested in contributing to this series, please pitch DigiLabour. We are open to receiving submissions related but are not exclusive to the following topics: National and local “anti-fake news” legislations Analysis of local media and information ecosystems and their vulnerabilities to disinformation Global and local platform determinist narratives and their strategic aims Transnational flows of misinformation Auto-ethnography of participating in anti-disinformation coalitions Activist collaboration, but also infighting and conflicts Politics of funding in the anti-disinformation space When disinformation becomes a politician’s advocacy Successful outcomes of local / targeted disinformation interventions Fact-checkers as precarious laborers Ethnographic portraits of “paid trolls”, click farm and disinformation-for-hire workers Political economy of disinformation Documenting digital harms to local communities Cultural blindspots of content moderation and platform policy Understudied digital platforms in the global South. Jonathan Corpus Ong is Associate Professor of Global Digital Media at the University of Massachusetts – Amherst. In 2020-2022, he is also Research Fellow at Harvard University’s Shorenstein Center for the Technology and Social Change Project. Rafael Grohmann is Assistant Professor of Media Studies with focus on Critical Platform and Data Studies at the University of Toronto. DigiLabour Share This No Older Articles Next ArticlePublic Discourse, Democracy and the Brazilian Presidential Election on Meta’s Facebook 18 de October de 2022